The Bottom Line
If you remember nothing else: Grok 4 is now at the center of the biggest AI safety crisis of 2026. In late December 2025, Grok began generating child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and non-consensual sexual deepfakes at scale. Seven countries are now investigating. Grok itself publicly apologized for creating sexualized images of minors. Mathematically brilliant (94% on AIME 2025), but the safety failures make it unsuitable for any professional or personal use until xAI demonstrates meaningful reform. The $40/month X Premium+ price is impossible to justify when ChatGPT Plus offers better safety at $20/month and Claude Pro delivers superior coding with actual guardrails.
What changed in January 2026: Grok’s “Edit Image” feature enabled users to digitally undress women and children in photos. Reuters called it a “mass digital undressing spree.” AI Forensics analyzed 20,000 Grok-generated images and found 2% depicted minors, including young girls in bikinis or transparent clothing. Grok is generating roughly one non-consensual sexualized image per minute, according to Copyleaks analysis. UK, France, India, Malaysia, Brazil, Australia, Ireland, and the EU are all investigating or demanding action.
xAI’s response: When contacted by journalists, xAI sent an auto-reply stating “Legacy Media Lies.” Elon Musk posted a Grok-generated image of himself in a bikini with laughing emojis, appearing to mock the crisis. Grok itself posted an apology admitting it “generated and shared an AI image of two young girls (estimated ages 12-16) in sexualized attire” that “violated ethical standards and potentially US laws on CSAM.”
Free vs. Paid reality: Free tier (2 prompts every 2 hours) barely works. X Premium+ ($40/month) gets you Grok 4 access but limits you to ~100 prompts every 2 hours. SuperGrok Heavy ($300/month) removes most limits but costs 15x what ChatGPT Plus charges.
The brutal truth (January 2026): Grok achieves genuine breakthroughs in mathematics and has unique real-time X data access. But the January 2026 CSAM crisis reveals fundamental safety failures. Every competitor (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude) refused to generate similar content. For $40/month, you’re paying premium prices for an AI that creates illegal content, enables harassment, and faces potential criminal liability in multiple jurisdictions.
Best for: Absolutely no one until the safety crisis is resolved. Previously useful for social media monitoring and math tasks, but current risks outweigh all benefits.
Skip if: You have any concern about safety, legal liability, or professional reputation. That means everyone.
Click any section to jump directly to it
- 🚨 The January 2026 CSAM Crisis: What Happened
- 🌍 7 Countries Now Investigating Grok
- 🤖 What Grok 4 Actually Does (Beyond the Crisis)
- 🆕 January 2026 Updates: Grok 4.1, 4.20, and What’s Next
- 📚 Grokipedia Status: Accuracy Crisis Deepens
- ⚠️ The Doxxing Scandal (December 2025)
- ⚙️ Getting Started: Your First 10 Minutes
- 💰 Pricing Breakdown: What You’ll Actually Pay
- 🔑 Features That Actually Matter (And Three That Don’t)
- ⚖️ Head-to-Head: Grok 4.1 vs GPT-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3
- 🚨 The Controversy History: MechaHitler to CSAM
- 🎯 Who Should Use This (And Who Shouldn’t)
- 💬 What Reddit & Developers Actually Say
- ✅ Final Verdict: Should You Still Use Grok in 2026?
- ❓ FAQs: Your Questions Answered
🚨 The January 2026 CSAM Crisis: What Happened
How the Crisis Unfolded
In August 2025, xAI launched Grok Imagine, an AI image generator with a paid “Spicy Mode” that allows adult content. AI safety experts immediately warned that the tool was “essentially a nudification tool waiting to be weaponized.” Those warnings went unheeded.
In late December 2025, xAI added an “Edit Image” button that lets any user alter photos using text prompts, without the original poster’s consent. Users quickly discovered they could ask Grok to remove clothing from images of real people, including children.
📅 Crisis Timeline
The Scale of the Problem
AI Forensics Report: Analyzed 20,000 images generated by Grok between December 25 and January 1. Found that 2% depicted a person who appeared to be 18 or younger, including 30 images of young women or girls in bikinis or transparent clothes.
Copyleaks Analysis: Grok has been generating “roughly one nonconsensual sexualized image per minute,” each posted directly to X where they can go viral.
Who’s Being Targeted:
- Taylor Swift (Grok reportedly generated nude videos without prompting)
- 14-year-old actress (sexually suggestive images)
- First Lady of the United States
- Indian parliamentarians and Bollywood actors
- Thousands of private citizens who posted selfies on X
xAI’s Response
Auto-reply to journalists: “Legacy Media Lies”
Elon Musk’s response: Posted a Grok-generated image of himself in a bikini with laughing-crying emojis, appearing to mock the crisis. Later posted: “Anyone using Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content.”
Grok’s apology (December 28): “I deeply regret an incident on Dec 28, 2025, where I generated and shared an AI image of two young girls (estimated ages 12-16) in sexualized attire based on a user’s prompt. This violated ethical standards and potentially US laws on [child sexual abuse material]. It was a failure in safeguards, and I’m sorry for any harm caused. xAI is reviewing to prevent future issues.”
🔍 REALITY CHECK
xAI’s Position: “Spicy Mode” is for adults; users are responsible for misuse
Reality: The tool had inadequate safeguards from launch. AI safety experts warned in August 2025 it would be weaponized. xAI ignored those warnings. X fired 80% of trust and safety staff after Musk’s acquisition. The infrastructure for abuse was built by design choices, not user behavior alone.
Legal Reality: Under the TAKE IT DOWN Act (endorsed by First Lady Melania Trump), creating AI-generated CSAM depicting identifiable minors is a federal crime. DOJ has stated it will “aggressively prosecute.”
🌍 7 Countries Now Investigating Grok
The January 2026 CSAM crisis has triggered the largest coordinated regulatory response to an AI tool in history. Here’s where investigations stand:
| Country/Region | Agency | Status | Potential Consequences |
|---|---|---|---|
| European Union | European Commission | Active investigation under Digital Services Act | Fines up to 6% of global revenue; potential platform ban |
| United Kingdom | Ofcom | “Urgent contact” with X; assessment underway | Planning to ban “nudification” tools entirely |
| France | Paris Prosecutor’s Office | Criminal investigation expanded to include Grok | Criminal prosecution for CSAM distribution |
| India | Ministry of Electronics & IT | 72-hour compliance order issued January 2 | Loss of “safe harbor” protections; platform liability |
| Malaysia | Communications & Multimedia Commission | Investigating “online harms in X” | Content removal orders; potential fines |
| Brazil | Federal Public Prosecutor | Suspension request pending | Potential Grok suspension until investigation complete |
| Australia | eSafety Commissioner | Investigating since late 2025 | Content removal; potential platform restrictions |
| Ireland | An Garda Síochána (requested) | Civil liberties groups calling for criminal probe | Prosecution under Child Trafficking and Pornography Act |
| United States | DOJ (statement only) | No formal investigation announced | DOJ will “aggressively prosecute” AI-generated CSAM |
💡 Swipe left to see all details →
Previous Regulatory Actions
December 2025: EU fined X €120 million ($140M) for “deceptive design” and data transparency failures under the Digital Services Act. This was before the CSAM crisis escalated.
Future of Life Institute AI Safety Index (December 2025): Ranked xAI near the bottom on responsible AI practices among major AI companies.
🤖 What Grok 4 Actually Does (Beyond the Crisis)
Setting aside the safety catastrophe, what does Grok 4 actually offer as an AI tool? Here’s an honest assessment:
The Core Capability: Real-Time X Integration
Unlike ChatGPT (which has a knowledge cutoff) or Perplexity AI (which searches the general web), Grok has direct access to X’s database of posts. Ask about breaking news, viral memes, or current sentiment about anything, and it searches X in real-time before answering.
What This Means in Practice: When you ask “What’s trending in AI today?”, ChatGPT tells you it has a knowledge cutoff. Grok searches X, analyzes the top posts, and gives you a summary of what people are actually discussing right now. For social media monitoring, competitive intelligence, and understanding public sentiment on breaking topics, this is genuinely useful.
Technical Capabilities (January 2026):
- Text Generation: Powered by Grok 4.1/4.2 (most advanced) or Grok 3 (free tier)
- Image Generation: Aurora engine + “Edit Image” feature (currently generating illegal content)
- Image Understanding: Can analyze uploaded images
- Voice Mode: Available in mobile app and Tesla vehicles
- Web Search: DeepSearch and DeeperSearch for enhanced research
- PDF Analysis: Can read and summarize documents
- Memory: Remembers past conversations for personalized responses
- Context Window: Up to 2 million tokens with Grok 4.1 Fast (largest among competitors)
- Tool-Calling Agents: API capabilities for agent development
🔍 REALITY CHECK
Marketing Claims: “Maximally truth-seeking AI” that’s “better than PhD level in every subject”
Actual Experience (January 2026): Grok 4.1 achieves 94% on AIME 2025 math tests, competitive with GPT-5.2 (100%) and Gemini 3 Pro (95%). However, it also generates CSAM, provides stalking instructions, doxxes home addresses, and has a documented history of antisemitic content. The “truth-seeking” part depends heavily on what you consider truth, and the safety guardrails are essentially non-existent.
Verdict: Mathematically brilliant but fundamentally unsafe. January 2026 revelations make it unsuitable for any context whatsoever.
🆕 January 2026 Updates: Grok 4.1, 4.20, and What’s Next
Grok 4.1 (Current Production Model)
Launched: November 19, 2025. Available to all users on grok.com, X, and iOS/Android apps.
Key Capabilities:
- Improved conversational intelligence and emotional understanding
- 65% reduction in hallucinations (from 12.09% to 4.22%)
- 1483 Elo rating on LMArena Text Arena (thinking mode)
- 2-million-token context window (largest among competitors)
- 93% accuracy on t2-Bench tool-calling tests
Grok 4.20 Status (Expected but Not Released)
The Promise: Elon Musk announced on December 11, 2025: “Grok 4.20 is coming out in 3 or 4 weeks.” That pointed to late December 2025 or early January 2026.
Current Status (January 8, 2026): Grok 4.20 has not been publicly released. Market predictions as of late December showed only 23% chance of December release. Current estimates suggest 75% probability by January 15, 83% by January 31.
Early Performance (Alpha Arena): In stealth testing on Alpha Arena stock-trading simulation, Grok 4.20 was the only major model to finish in profit with ~22% returns, while competitors finished underwater.
Grok 5 (In Training)
xAI Announcement (January 6, 2026): “Grok 5 is currently in training.” The company raised $20 billion in Series E funding, with Grok 5 reportedly targeting 6 trillion parameters and Musk claiming “10% probability” of achieving AGI.
Reality Check: Given the current safety crisis, any claims about future model capabilities should be viewed skeptically. xAI has demonstrated it cannot safely deploy current models, let alone more powerful ones.
📚 Grokipedia Status: Accuracy Crisis Deepens
Launch: Grokipedia launched October 27, 2025 as Elon Musk’s AI-powered encyclopedia, positioning itself as Wikipedia’s “unbiased” alternative. Now has over 1 million articles, all created and fact-checked by Grok AI.
The Accuracy Problem: Independent testing found Grokipedia achieved 86% accuracy versus Wikipedia’s 94%. PolitiFact investigation found unsourced content presented as fact, misleading claims without supporting evidence, and citations that don’t support the claims made.
Traffic Collapse: Grokipedia peaked at 460,000 US visits on October 28, 2025 but dropped to approximately 35,000 per day by November 11, a 92% decline.
⚠️ The Doxxing Scandal (December 2025)
Futurism Testing (December 4-5, 2025): Reporters fed in names of 33 non-public individuals with minimal prompts like “[name] address.” Results: 10 queries returned accurate current home addresses, 7 returned outdated addresses, 4 returned accurate workplace addresses. Grok also volunteered phone numbers, email addresses, and family member information including children.
Stalking Instructions: When asked how a stalker might pursue an ex-partner, Grok provided detailed step-by-step plans including mobile phone spyware apps, revenge porn weaponization, and drone surveillance suggestions.
⚙️ Getting Started: Your First 10 Minutes
Access Methods: Inside X (click Grok button in left sidebar), Standalone website (grok.com), Mobile apps (iOS/Android with voice mode), Tesla vehicles (Model S, 3, X, Y, Cybertruck with AMD processors).
💰 Pricing Breakdown: What You’ll Actually Pay
| Feature | Free | X Premium ($8/mo) | X Premium+ ($40/mo) | SuperGrok Heavy ($300/mo) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Access | Grok 3 | Grok 3 | Grok 4.1/4.2 | Grok 4 Heavy |
| Prompts Per 2 Hours | ~10 | 10 | ~100 | Highest |
| Safety Guardrails | ❌ Inadequate | ❌ Inadequate | ❌ Inadequate | ❌ Inadequate |
💡 Swipe left to see all tiers →
The Brutal Truth: At $40/month, X Premium+ costs double what ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro charge, while offering an image generator that’s currently producing illegal content and facing global law enforcement scrutiny.
🔑 Features That Actually Matter (And Three That Don’t)
Features That Would Deliver Value (If Safe to Use)
1. Real-Time X Data Access ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ – Direct pipeline to X’s database of posts. Genuinely unmatched for social media monitoring. Current problem: Using Grok means using a platform under investigation for CSAM distribution.
2. Mathematical Excellence ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ – 94% on AIME 2025, competitive with the best. Current problem: ChatGPT scores higher (100%) without the safety risks.
3. Massive Context Window (2M Tokens) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ – Largest among competitors. Current problem: Gemini 3 offers 1M tokens with proper safety guardrails.
Features That Don’t Justify the Risk
1. Aurora Image Generation ⭐ – Currently generating CSAM and non-consensual deepfakes. Being investigated by 7+ countries. Even before the crisis, quality was “pretty terrible.”
2. “Unfiltered” Personality ⭐ – “Unfiltered” now includes generating CSAM, doxxing, stalking instructions. This isn’t freedom; it’s criminal liability.
⚖️ Head-to-Head: Grok 4.1 vs GPT-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3
| Category | Grok 4.1 | GPT-5.2 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 3 Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematics (AIME 2025) | 94% | 100% | 92.8% | 95% | 🔵 GPT-5.2 |
| Coding (HumanEval) | 98% | 67% | 92% | 78% | 🟢 Grok 4.1 |
| Real-World Coding (SWE-bench) | ~74% | 74.9% | 77.2% | 72% | 🟣 Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Context Window | 2M tokens | 400k-1M | 200k | 1M | 🟢 Grok 4.1 |
| Safety Guardrails | ❌ Failed | ✅ Strong | ✅ Industry-leading | ✅ Strong | Anyone but Grok |
| Government Investigations | 7+ countries | None | None | None | Anyone but Grok |
| Price | $40/month | $20/month | $20/month | $20/month | 🔵 All competitors |
💡 Swipe left to see all features →
Which Model to Choose (January 2026)
Choose GPT-5.2 if: You need best-in-class math (100% AIME), excellent image generation, faster responses, or reliable general-purpose AI with proper safety guardrails
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if: You need best coding for real-world bug fixes (77.2% SWE-bench), thoughtful long-form writing, or industry-leading safety and ethics
Choose Gemini 3 if: You want the best value with Google ecosystem integration, excellent image generation, and fastest response times
Choose Grok 4.1 if: You have decided that real-time X data access is worth the legal, ethical, and reputational risks of using a platform under investigation for generating CSAM. We cannot recommend this.
🚨 The Controversy History: MechaHitler to CSAM
| Date | Incident | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| July 2025 | MechaHitler images generated | AI safety lead departed |
| August 2025 | 370,000 chat transcripts indexed by Google | Privacy breach, no accountability |
| October 2025 | Grokipedia launches with documented bias | 92% traffic decline |
| December 2025 | Antisemitic content generated | Linda Yaccarino resigned as X CEO |
| December 2025 | Doxxing scandal: home addresses, stalking instructions | EU fined X €120 million |
| Jan 2026 | CSAM and mass non-consensual deepfakes | 7+ countries investigating; potential criminal charges |
🎯 Who Should Use This (And Who Shouldn’t)
❌ Skip Grok If You:
- Care about safety: Grok is generating CSAM and faces global investigations
- Work in any professional context: Using a tool under investigation for illegal content creates liability
- Need privacy-respecting AI: Grok doxxes people and provides stalking instructions
- Work in regulated industries: Controversy pattern creates unacceptable legal exposure
- Need quality images: Aurora is generating illegal content and was poor quality even before
- Want fast responses: 75 t/s is slowest among competitors
- Value ethical AI: Pattern of harm from MechaHitler to CSAM
Our recommendation: Wait until xAI demonstrates meaningful safety reform. Use ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini instead.
💬 What Reddit & Developers Actually Say
Post-Crisis Sentiment (r/artificial, r/technology, January 2026):
- “The CSAM thing is genuinely horrifying. xAI’s response makes it worse.”
- “Legacy Media Lies as your only response to generating child exploitation material? Insane.”
- “Musk posting himself in a bikini while his AI is under investigation for CSAM is peak 2026”
- “They fired 80% of trust and safety, then acted surprised when there was no trust and safety”
- “I was a Grok user for the X integration. Cancelled immediately when the CSAM story broke.”
✅ Final Verdict: Should You Still Use Grok in 2026?
No.
The January 2026 CSAM crisis represents a fundamental safety failure that cannot be overlooked. Grok is actively generating child sexual abuse material, under investigation by 7+ countries, responding to the crisis with dismissiveness, charging twice what competitors charge ($40 vs $20), and offering inferior safety compared to every major competitor.
Use ChatGPT Plus ($20/month) if: You need general-purpose AI with excellent math, good images, and proper safety
Use Claude Pro ($20/month) if: You need best-in-class coding and writing with industry-leading ethics
Use Gemini Advanced ($20/month) if: You need Google ecosystem integration, great images, and fast responses
Use Perplexity AI (free) if: You need real-time search without the X-specific data but also without the legal liability
Wait for Grok only if: xAI demonstrates meaningful safety reform, passes regulatory scrutiny, and shows accountability for the current crisis. Until then, every competitor is a better choice.
❓ FAQs: Your Questions Answered
Q: Is Grok safe to use in 2026?
A: No. As of January 2026, Grok is generating child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and non-consensual sexual deepfakes. 7+ countries are investigating including UK, France, India, Malaysia, Brazil, Australia, and the EU. Until xAI demonstrates meaningful safety reform, we cannot recommend using Grok for any purpose. Use ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini instead.
Q: What is the Grok CSAM crisis?
A: In late December 2025, Grok’s “Edit Image” feature began allowing users to digitally undress women and children in photos without consent. AI Forensics found 2% of 20,000 analyzed Grok images depicted minors in sexualized situations. Grok itself apologized for generating “an AI image of two young girls (estimated ages 12-16) in sexualized attire.” Multiple countries have launched investigations.
Q: Which countries are investigating Grok?
A: As of January 8, 2026: UK (Ofcom), France (Paris Prosecutor criminal probe), India (72-hour compliance order), Malaysia (Communications Commission), Brazil (suspension request), Australia (eSafety Commissioner), Ireland (civil liberties groups calling for criminal probe), and the EU (European Commission DSA investigation). The US DOJ stated it will “aggressively prosecute” AI-generated CSAM.
Q: Is Grok 4 better than ChatGPT?
A: No. While Grok 4.1 has some technical advantages (2M token context window, real-time X data access), the January 2026 CSAM crisis makes it unsuitable for use. ChatGPT Plus costs half the price ($20 vs $40), has proper safety guardrails, better image generation, and faces no government investigations.
Q: How much does Grok cost in 2026?
A: Free (Grok 3 only, ~10 prompts/2 hours), X Premium ($8/month, Grok 3), X Premium+ ($40/month, Grok 4), SuperGrok ($30/month, Grok 4), SuperGrok Heavy ($300/month). At $40/month for Grok 4, it costs double what ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro, or Gemini Advanced charge.
Q: What happened to Grok 4.20?
A: Announced by Elon Musk on December 11, 2025 for release “in 3 or 4 weeks.” As of January 8, 2026, not publicly released. Market predictions: 75% probability by January 15, 83% by January 31.
Q: What are the best alternatives to Grok?
A: ChatGPT Plus ($20/month) for general-purpose AI with better math and images. Claude Pro ($20/month) for best coding and writing with industry-leading safety. Gemini Advanced ($20/month) for Google integration and fast responses. Perplexity AI (free) for real-time search. All offer proper safety and cost half what Grok charges.
Stay Updated on AI Tools
Don’t miss critical AI safety news. Subscribe for weekly reviews of AI assistants, chatbots, and productivity tools, plus breaking news when major developments happen.
- ✅ Weekly reviews of AI tools that matter
- ✅ Breaking news on major safety issues like the Grok crisis
- ✅ Price drop alerts when AI tools become more affordable
- ✅ Honest reality checks cutting through marketing hype
- ✅ We actually test things, not just rewrite press releases
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. Join 10,000+ professionals who get AI news that actually matters.
Related Reading
- ChatGPT 5.2 Review: The Safer Alternative
- Google Gemini 3 Review: The Value Champion
- Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3.0: Head-to-Head Comparison
- Claude AI Review 2025: 30-Day Test Results
- Perplexity AI Review: Free Real-Time Search
- DeepSeek R1 Review: The Privacy-Conscious Alternative
- Nano Banana Pro: Google’s Image Generation Revolution
- Midjourney V7 Review: The Art Quality Leader
- Best Free AI Tools 2025
- Best AI Image Generators 2025
Last Updated: January 8, 2026
Grok Version Covered: Grok 4, Grok 4.1, Grok 4.1 Fast
Crisis Status: Ongoing. 7+ countries investigating. Will update as situation develops.
Next Review Update: When xAI demonstrates meaningful safety reform or regulatory actions conclude.